from Winston Peters: NZ First’s immigration policy

I am writing directly because otherwise we cannot trust that New Zealanders will ever hear the full substance of what we are proposing.

Our policies get condensed into headlines and announcements become stories about how whingers react to them. Sensible common sense policies that most New Zealanders agree with are treated as controversies, or reframed into what somebody else says we really meant. Sometimes the detail barely gets a look in at all.

So rather than rely on someone else to interpret New Zealand First’s position for you, I want to explain it directly.

The idea connecting much of what we are proposing at this election is clear. It is that New Zealand should control its own future.

These are complex and challenging times. We cannot afford to give the reins to student politicians and those who have already shown their willingness to vandalise our future. New Zealand needs experience, and through experience, good judgement that protects New Zealand’s vital interests first and foremost.

New Zealand First takes the world as it is, not as some cloistered postmodern lecturer or dancing green TikToker wants it to be. With experience comes prudence, common sense, and the understanding that sometimes we have to make hard decisions. And with enough New Zealand First MPs comes the power to decide our own future, instead of having it decided for us.

The economy is not where it should be. Kiwis know that without being told. We said at the last election that the damage done by the previous Labour Government could not be undone in three years. We were right. There is growth happening, but not nearly as much as we need.

The sad truth about New Zealand over the past fifty years is that we went from the top tier in the world to a non-competing economy. In 1984 came the neoliberal experiment of Labour’s Roger Douglas followed by the austerity of National’s Ruth Richardson. The left and the right went on to sell our assets, privatise our country, and open our borders to mass immigration. Forty years down the track we can see it has been an abject failure.

Only one party never subscribed to that ideology. New Zealand First was formed because we opposed it. We have always believed in economic nationalism. The radical notion that we own our country’s assets and we should use them to our benefit.

We believe in targeted government intervention and giving a hand up in times of need. We support capitalism with a human face and a spirit of solidarity.

New Zealand is a sovereign nation and we resist anyone who seeks to undermine that by increasing our dependence on external powers. It is time to tear up globalist agreements that exist to extract billions from New Zealanders for emissions that are a wisp of smoke compared to the industrial scale deluge from the likes of China, India, and the United States.

We are too dependent on volatile markets and supply chains that we have seen severely tested in recent years. New Zealand First’s vision is one of economic independence. But that kind of future requires keeping the maniacal activists away from the levers of power. We cannot afford to have our future in the hands of ideological fools who would snitch on their own country to impress Greta Thunberg.

We need adults in the room with enough of a backbone to say “actually we are going to use our own resources” just like other countries do. This term of government Shane Jones has relentlessly resisted the pearl clutching of other parties. He has had to battle the activists on the other side of Parliament who would shut down industries and projects with the potential to provide Kiwi workers with high wages because virtue signalling is more important. 

New Zealand First says we can take control of our own future. We can make the most of our resources, build sovereign wealth, and ensure that ours is a country that works for its people.

This brings me to the main reason I am writing to you directly. It turns out our national media outlets have decided to ignore New Zealand First’s immigration policies.They are the first to jump on the slightest negativity, but when we lay out a comprehensive policy they suddenly go dumb, deaf, and blind.

I do not intend to leave it to editors, commentators, or our political opponents to tell you what New Zealand First believes. I would rather tell you directly, set out the policy plainly, and let you judge it for yourself.

The commentators have microphones, newspapers and television studios. We have to pay to communicate directly with voters.

First and foremost, we must have the discipline and sense to control our borders and ensure that those we let into this country are here to fill gaps in our workforces and are willing to respect our values and way of life. 

Immigration is where the principle of sovereignty is truly tested.

How many times has New Zealand First been attacked as “xenophobic” and “racist” for asserting that New Zealand has a culture worth protecting? 

Look around the world. There are plenty of examples of what we do not want our country to become. But instead of appreciating what we have and being patriots for New Zealand, those in green and red seem to hate everything we stand for.

They are oikophobes, fetishising everyone else’s cultures, wearing their flags, shouting their chants, while loathing the free and just democracy they were lucky enough to inherit.

Around 30% of current New Zealand residents were not even born here. Thirty years ago it was 17%. If we carry on this trajectory, by our grandchildren’s generation that could well be more than half.

This is a system that is out of control and worst of all, many of the political class have no desire to wrangle it back.

The fact is, in the past four years we have seen a net increase of 165,000 new migrants. Under Labour’s final year of government alone they let in 131,000 net. When we were in government in 2017, we ensured immigration was cut back, but when we were out, and Labour was left to their own devices the foot came off the brake. 

National and ACT said absolutely nothing either. One is too scared of being called “racist” in the newspapers and the other only sees demands from some businesses for cheap labour to undercut our own workforce.

As it says in the good book: by their deeds you will know them.

We need immigration. Don’t let any biased columnist tell you that New Zealand First is anti-immigration because we are not. It has been an essential part of our history and we are all descendent from people who decided to venture here for opportunity.

But immigration must be smart and controlled. Allowing in immigrants we need, not people who need us. The Kiwi dream belongs to Kiwis who have worked hard for this country, invested time, sweat and pride, and share in our history. It is not for just anybody who arrives for five minutes and claims what we have built for their convenience.

For decades you have heard other politicians here and abroad parroting that “diversity is our greatest strength.” That is false. Unity is our strength. Diversity, without a common purpose, is weakness and division. We do not have to all be the same and have the same story, but we do need to be pulling in the same direction.

That is why we have announced the most serious immigration reform in a generation.

Whatever your view of these proposals ultimately is, you should at least know what New Zealand First is actually proposing before somebody else tells you what to think about it.

So here it is, plainly and without the filter.

This is what New Zealand First is proposing on immigration:

  • Only the children of citizens will automatically receive citizenship at birth.
  • Citizenship can only be applied for after ten years, not five.
  • Permanent residence after five years, not two.
  • There will be higher fees that reflect the value of what is being granted.
  • A ten year welfare stand-down for non-citizens.
  • Social housing for citizens first.
  • Wider deportation powers.
  • Automatic deportation for violent and sexual crimes, fraud, organised crime, money laundering and migrant exploitation.
  • A referendum on a 20,000 resident-visa cap.
  • A 30 year population plan.
  • Student visa holders who want another visa must leave and apply from abroad.
  • No automatic work rights that take jobs off Kiwis.
  • Establish protected person status that is temporary by design.
  • No asylum claims will be able to be applied for from a work visa. 
  • No using temporary work rights as a stepping stone.
  • A 24-month window for all overstayers to leave, if they are found after that period they will be deported and banned from reentry. 
  • For Pacific overstayers only, there will be a 24-month clemency to legally apply for a valid visa to remain, if they are found after that period they will be deported and banned from reentry.
  • And a New Zealand First Minister holding the Immigration portfolio. 

Without a New Zealand First Immigration Minister, this vision for taking control of our future is just fantasy. National and ACT need New Zealand First to save them from their own instincts. 

Because we actually do have the right to determine the future size and character of our country. New Zealand citizenship is a privilege, not a right.

So there you have it. The policy that taxpayer-owned TVNZ has refused to report. Not one story. Not one article.

We are the only socially conservative party and they do not like it. The only nationalist party and they do not like it. The only patriotic party, a word now so often criticised. We stand proud to be patriots of New Zealand. Most important, we are the only party that can counter-balance the present spectrum of extremists in Parliament.

We have won many battles. The war is not yet over.

Believe me when I tell you that we in New Zealand First do not think we are just running in another election. We understand that we are running to save our country economically and socially from extremists.

To do that we need many more New Zealand First MPs. Many, many more.

So do not give us a microlight and then ask us to fly to the moon. If you give us the tools, we will finish the job. Donate Now.

That means organisation, halls, printing, travel, and the means to put our case when the official channels will not. 

We rely on New Zealanders like you who still believe this country is worth defending.

True democracy is a rare flower in the history of humanity. We inherited a free country that our forebears fought and died for. It is our job to preserve it. We must never stop believing in New Zealand.

Protect. Save. Restore. Put New Zealand and New Zealanders first.

We are asking you to join us, and Party Vote New Zealand First.

P.S. They have the state broadcaster. We have you. If you can send something today, send it. Cool heads and rational judgement still need the numbers, and the means, to be heard.

unanswered questions remain on what ‘Character Area Protection’ can exist in Waikanae following the Garden Precinct Protection Society AGM

by Geoffrey Churchman

Local MP Tim Costley addressing the audience.

Last Saturday the Waikanae Garden Precinct Protection Society‘s AGM took place at which the public was invited to hear what the four main general election candidates for the Kapiti electorate had to say.

Last year, the number of AGM attendees totaled about 80; this year the number swelled to over 250 with standing room only. Chairer Michelle Court said the society had largely been on standby mode this year because of the pending law changes since the last AGM and the commitee has only met about every two months (the Concerned Ratepayers Kapiti committee meets about every 2 weeks). The hope was that the candidates for each main party would clearly state their interpretation and views of the new laws.

The former complex Resource Management Act (a goldmine for certain lawyers) has now been replaced with two separate laws: the Planning Act and the Natural Environment Act.

Key changes are:

  • Replaces more than 100 separate council planning documents with 17 combined regional plans.
  • Removes roughly 45% of current resource consent categories and streamline approval pathways.
  • Introduces nationally standardized land-use zones to provide regulatory consistency across regions. [1, 2, 3, 4]

The new Planning Act excludes subjective neighbourhood character and visual amenity from regulation, effectively phasing out general special character area protections unless they qualify strictly as significant historic heritage. Only formally identified significant historic heritage is protected, meaning standard character overlays that do not meet high heritage thresholds will not be preserved. (Section 14 — “Effects outside scope of this Act”)

Under the housing intensification rules made by the Jacinda regime, Kapiti Coast District Council did not outright remove special character areas from the conversation, but enabled medium-density housing within them because the central government directed that “special character” is not a legally recognized “qualifying matter” to block housing supply.

The housing intensification rules introduced via Draft Plan Change 2 to comply with Central Government’s density mandates, saw the KCDC remove existing rules that restricted development density in designated “special character” areas to enable “medium-density housing” across these zones.

It doesn’t seem that has changed.

Property businessmen Palmer & Cook moved into the hitherto specially defined Waikanae Garden Precinct with their 19 townhouses at 14-16 Ngarara Road which had previously been a single large architect-designed dwelling on 4,864 square metres of tree-covered land (1.2 acres). Oh, but it’s nicely designed, they protested in reaction to the heavy criticism. Maybe, maybe not, but it still replaced a lot of desirable trees with concrete and row houses. At least it wasn’t the glaring eyesore that those responsible for 10-12 Utauta Street created, small mercies.

Palmer & Cook are still pursuing their pack ‘n’ stack plans in Eruini St which are likewise widely opposed.

So what did the candidates say?

Tim Costley was the most impressive, making points and answering qustions authoritively. He said that KCDC has plenty of land available for 30 years of population growth, although what that projected figure is wasn’t mentioned; Mayor Holborow didn’t offer a contribution on that. What he was able to say, however, is that there is still plenty of pasture land between Waikanae and Peka Peka that can be converted into dwellings of whatever nature.

Sophie Handford said that Labour will change aspects of the new laws, but was vague about what and in what timeframe. My hunch is that she’s not a fan of what Palmer & Cook have done — she lives in a nice bush-fringed property close to me — but is loyal to the party’s policy as stated above. Like Penny Gaylor, she made a lot of ideological statements that weren’t enlightening and didn’t say whether she was for or against what has happened locally.

Penny Gaylor mostly said simply, “NZ First is part of the coalition government and I support what it has done.” Green Party member Melody Willis, a 20-something female who appeared in green slacks, admitted she doesn’t live in the electorate, rather in the Left stronghold of Aro Valley in Wellington, and knew little about Waikanae. She’s not expecting people to vote for her, but is there as a flag waver for the party vote.

ACT is also after the party vote and is telling people to vote for Tim Costley as the electorate MP.

More will analysed probably early in the new year.

France: Macron migrant impales a fluffy pet cat on a fence

Mohammed Y, a 32-year-old homeless migrant who is under a deportation order in France, has admitted killing Myrtille, a Maine Coon found skinned and impaled on a fence near a school in Six-Fours-les-Plages, southeastern France. He is currently imprisoned in a separate case involving the stabbing of a person.

Another reason to oppose the Leftists-Globalists, who want a tsumani of undesirable people from the Third World.

UK: primitive military age men are coming to rape and pillage you (‘und you vill be happy’)

Schoolkids are told by Leftists-Globalists to list only the ‘positives‘ of mass migration

by Steve Watson

Rewrite the “negative” headlines

Children as young as seven are being sat down in British classrooms and told to list the “positive” aspects of migration — and only the positives. No pressure on housing. No wages. No hotels. No community strain. Just the approved script.

Show Racism the Red Card, which brands itself the UK’s “leading anti-racism charity,” has produced lesson plans that treat migration as an unalloyed good.

Pupils are being handed headlines such as “how many more migrants can we take?” and instructed to rewrite them in a cheerier register — “migrant workers bring fresh hope to British economy” is the model answer. The materials describe the exercise as “an opportunity to explore what is positive and good about migration.”

It’s pure insidious indoctrination.

The same packs tell British kids that women and children make up 80 per cent of refugees worldwide. They do not mention that adult men account for around three-quarters of those landing on British beaches in small boats.

Pupils are told it is “false” to claim most people fleeing their countries are adult men. They are told asylum seekers survive on £6.42 a day and are banned from working. They are not told what hotels, HMO placements and the rest of the support system actually cost.

Listed “benefits” include filling vacancies, plugging skills shortages, propping up social care and closing the “pension gap” with young foreign workers. There is no matching column for crowded classrooms, GP waiting lists, suppressed wages at the bottom end, or what happens when too many people arrive too fast into towns that never voted for any of it.

this must be a reason why EU bosses want their war to continue

The big problem is that the EU is almost out of both weapons and ‘mahney’ to send to Zelenksy’s neo-Nazis. The coming winter is going to be rough on ordinary Ukrainians who haven’t yet fled west or east (high fuel prices means it won’t be easy for people in the Euro-Reich either).

a great Leftist (BBC) propaganda fail

Oops!